Describing Cultural Identity of AAC Users: Highlighting Immersive Education Programs

Authors: Victoria Avila, Carolina Chavez, Kathryn Lowry, Abigael Marroon and Marcia Walsh-Aziz, Ph.D., CCC-SLP

  1. Broomfield, K., Harrop, D., Jones, G. L., Sage, K., & Judge, S. (2022). A qualitative evidence synthesis of the experiences and perspectives of communicating using augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 19(5), 1802-1816. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2022.2105961
  2. Broomfield, K., Harrop, D., Judge, S., Jones, G. L., & Sage, K. (2019). Appraising the quality of tools used to record patient reported outcomes in users of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC): a systematic review. Quality of Life Research 28, 2669–2683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02228-3
  3. Broomfield, K., Judge, S., Sage, K., Jones, G. L., & James, D. (2023). Using longitudinal qualitative research to explore the experience of receiving and using augmentative and alternative communication. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 59(3), 1043–1065. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12981
  4. Dodd, J. L., & Gorey, M. (2013). AAC intervention as an immersion model. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 35(2), 103-107. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525740113504242
  5. Hetzroni, O., & Harris, O. (1996). Cultural aspects in the development of AAC users. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 12(1), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434619612331277488
  6. Hammel, R. (2024). Dual language immersion program: Creates a language-rich environment for deaf and hard of hearing students. Odyssey. 40-43. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1450947.pdf
  7. Lund, S. K., & Light, J. (2007). Long-term outcomes for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: Part III – contributing factors. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23(4), 323–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/02656730701189123
  8. Padilla, A. M., Chen, X., Swanson, E., Peterson, M., Zamora, T., & Girsky, T. (2025). Longitudinal academic, language, and social emotional learning outcomes of graduates of a one-way Spanish Immersion program. Foreign Language Annals, 58, 111-136. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12782
  9. Ripat, J., & Woodgate, R. (2010). The intersection of culture, disability and assistive technology. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 6(2), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2010.507859
  10. Schuit, M., Segers, E., Balkom, H., Stoep, J., & Verhoeven, L. (2010). Immersive communication intervention for speaking and non-speaking children with intellectual disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 26(3), 203–218. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2010.505609
  11. Steele, J. L., Slater, R. O., Zamarro, G., Miller, T., Li, J., Burkhauser, S., & Bacon, M. (2017). Effects of dual-language immersion programs on student achievement: Evidence from lottery data. American Educational Research Journal, 54(1), 282S-306S. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216634463
  12. Wickenden, M. (2011). Whose voice is that?: Issues of identity, voice and representation arising in an ethnographic study of the lives of disabled teenagers who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). Disability Studies Quarterly, 31(4). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v31i4.1724
  13. Wofford, M. C., Ogletree, B. T., & De Nardoa, T. (2022). Identity-focused practice in augmentative and alternative communication services: A framework to support the intersecting identities of individuals with severe disabilities. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 31(5), 1933-1948. https://doi.org/10.1044/2022_AJSLP-21-00397