Request Information
Ready to find out what MSU Denver can do for you? We’ve got you covered.
For courses and programs offered via distance education in which students may be eligible to use Title IV funds (federal financial aid), the Department of Education (ED) requires that institutions like the Metropolitan State University of Denver are able to confirm and document that there is regular and substantive interaction between students and their instructors.
This page aims to help faculty and staff understand this requirement and associated regulations, apprise them of the difference between distance and correspondence education, and offer guidance and suggestions for creating and offering opportunities for regular and substantive interaction in the digital classroom.
Distance education is, according to the ED, education that uses one or more technologies to deliver instruction to students who are physically separated from the instructor and to support regular and substantive interaction between the students and the instructor, either synchronously or asynchronously.
Not all education that takes place in a digital environment (e.g., online) is considered distance education—the level of interaction and who initiates the interaction matter greatly. An important distinction is, according to the ED, that a course or program that can be described as “self-paced” is considered to be correspondence education, regardless of the technology used.
For the university and our students, it is important to know the difference between “distance” and “correspondence” modalities when creating or delivering courses and programs. The core feature that distinguishes a distance course from a correspondence course is the presence of regular and substantive interaction.
MSU Denver is recognized by our accreditor as an institution that offers/delivers correspondence courses and programs. MSU Denver also has approval to offer Title IX aid for these courses/programs.
Regular Substantive Interaction (RSI) in distance education refers to meaningful and consistent engagement between students and their instructors or the educational content. It’s about ensuring that students aren’t solely asked to passively absorb information but are expected to actively participate in the learning process.
The U.S. Department of Education now requires that all online courses for which students may use Title IV funds (federal financial aid) “ensure that there is regular and substantive interaction between students and faculty.” In online teaching and learning environments of any kind, (asynchronous, synchronous, blended/hybrid), regular and substantive interactions should:
RSI is essential because it keeps students engaged, helps clarify uncertainties, promotes deeper understanding of the material, and allows instructors to gauge student progress and provide necessary support. RSI encompasses a wide range of evolving practices for creating active learning communities in a digital space.
According to the MSU Denver catalog, these requirements apply to all of the online course modalities which include Asynchronous, Synchronous, Dual Mode Online, and Hybrid Online.
We are able to ensure regular interaction between a student and an instructor, prior to the student’s completion of a course or competency, by:
The requirement for the “regularity” of the interactions stops short of being overly prescriptive and allows for the various pedagogical techniques employed by the instructor(s) or required by the course. For this reason, course syllabi should clearly delineate expectations, instructional activities, regular meeting patterns, or opportunities for meetings per university guidelines.
Substantive interactions are interactions where the instructor actively engages students in teaching, learning, and assessment, consistent with the content under discussion and
Substantive interactions are interactions where the instructor actively engages students in teaching, learning, and assessment, consistent with the content under discussion and must include at least two of the following:
The language used by the Department of Education to clarify substantive interactions addresses the expectation that those involved in delivering distance education have the flexibility to be innovative in their approaches in education. That is, what is considered “substantive” for one course or program may not be for another.
Examples of regular and substantive interactions include, but are not limited to the following: