Skip to main content Skip to main content

HLC Accreditation Committee Co-Chairs

Nate Grimm | Budget and Finance Analyst | Budget Office

Bernice Harris | Associate Vice President for Curriculum and Academic Effectiveness | Academic Affairs

Steering Committee Members

Zsuzsa Balogh | Associate Professor | Civil Engineering Technology Department

Kim Bubon | Administrative Support | Academic and Student Affairs

Greg Clifton | Chair, Associate Professor | Accounting Department

Michael Erskine | Director | Educational Technology Center

Joan Foster | Dean | College of Letters, Arts and Sciences

Liz Hinde | Dean | School of Education

Jamie Hurst | Director of Alumni Relations and Giving | University Advancement

Samantha Kalinowski | Assistant Director | Office of Institutional Research

Gretta Mincer | Associate Director | Student Activities

Stephanie Protsman | Associate Registrar | Registrar’s Office

Maria Rey-Lopez | Associate Professor | Modern Languages Department

Linda Stroup | Chair, Associate Professor | Nursing Department

Kevin Taylor | Associate Director | Information Technology

Metza Templeton | Tuition Classification Officer | Registrar's Office

Dan Vaccaro | Assistant Director of Content | Marketing and Communications

Dave Weiden | Assistant Professor | Political Science Department

Work Group Leaders

Joan Foster | Work Group One | Mission

The institution’s mission is clear and articulated publicly; it guides the institutions operations.

Linda Stroup | Work Group Two | Integrity: Ethical and Responsible Conduct

The institution acts with integrity. Its conduct is ethical and responsible.

Dave Weiden | Work Group Three | Teaching and Learning: Quality, Resources and Support

The institution provides high-quality education, wherever and however its offerings are delivered.

Michael Erskine | Work Group Four | Teaching and Learning: Evaluation and Improvement

The institution demonstrates responsibility for the quality of its educational programs, learning environments, and support services, and it evaluates their effectiveness for student learning through processes designed to promote continuous improvement.

Liz Hinde | Work Group Five | Resources, Planning and Institutional Effectiveness

The institution’s resources, structures and processes are sufficient to fulfill its mission, improve the quality of its educational offerings and respond to future challenges and opportunities. The institution plans for the future.

Greg Clifton | Work Group Six | Assumed practices and federal compliance documents

Dan Vaccaro | Work Group Seven | Communications

Edit this page